Competitor Group, Inc.

Lance Armstrong hits back at systematic doping allegations, addresses ownership of USPS team

by

Speaking to reporters in depth for the first time at this Tour de France about swirling accusations leveled by Floyd Landis, Lance Armstrong on Wednesday flatly denied being involved in systematic doping at the former U.S. Postal Service team for which both men rode.

“As long as I live, I will deny that,” he said before the start of stage 10. “There is absolutely no way I forced people, encouraged people, told people, helped people, facilitated… Absolutely not. One hundred percent.”

The New York Times reported Tuesday that federal investigators issued subpoenas to riders to appear before a grand jury regarding allegations of doping on the Postal team. No names have been revealed, and Armstrong said Wednesday he had not been subpoenaed nor contacted by Jeff Novitzky, an investigator for the Food & Drug Administration who is pursuing Landis’ claims.

As for what other USPS riders may or may not have done, Armstrong said that was beyond his control.

“I can’t speak to what they did themselves,” he said to reporters outside the RadioShack team bus. “I can’t control that. It would be like me asking you, do you think there is any abuse of performance enhancing drugs in the NFL in the offensive line? Most people would say probably yes. But does that mean that (NFL quarterback) Peyton Manning is guilty? I mean, I can’t control what other riders do. I really can’t.”

He also said he did not believe any former USPS rider would corroborate Landis’ claims that Armstrong doped while on the team, and along with team director Johan Bruyneel, taught Landis how to dope.

Armstrong made a point of clarifying his role regarding ownership of the USPS team.

“When the Postal Service was the sponsor of the team, I was a rider on the team,” Armstrong said. “Just like Frankie (Andreu), Kevin (Livingston), Tyler (Hamilton) or George (Hincapie). I was no different than anybody else.”

Investment executive and longtime cycling supporter Thomas Weisel founded Tailwind Sports, which ran the USPS team. Weisel could not immediately be contacted by VeloNews.

“I was a rider on the team that was contracted through Tailwind Sports. I never had any dealings – any dealings – with the U.S. Postal Service. Zero,” said Armstrong. “I didn’t own the company. I didn’t have a position. I didn’t have an equity stake. I didn’t have a seat on the board. I was a rider on the team. I can’t be any clearer than that.”

Tailwind’s management concluded when the U.S. Postal Service announced it would not continue sponsorship of the team after the 2004 season. Capital Sports & Entertainment, of which Armstrong is a partner, took over management of the squad, and contracted with Discovery Channel for title sponsorship of the team beginning in 2005. Many riders stayed through the transition, as did Bruyneel as director.

Asked how the investigation was affecting him, Armstrong replied: “There’s nothing I can do about that.”

“I think we have to be respectful of the process,” he said. “You hope that … both sides are respectful. Is it honorable and ethical and legitimate to be leaking things to the press and trying to push an agenda? Some would say no. Do the American people feel like this is a good use of their tax dollars? That’s for them to decide. But as long as we have a legitimate and credible and fair investigation, we will be happy to cooperate. But I’m not going to cooperate in any kind of which hunt. I’ve done too many good things for too many people.”

Armstrong said his name kept coming up because of the intentions of the media.

“The press is pushing an agenda here,” he said. “Look at the SI (Sports Illustrated) article in the beginning (May). ‘Lance Armstrong owned 50 percent of the (USPS) team and he defrauded the U.S. government.’ That is so fundamentally untrue and false.”

Armstrong reiterated his defense that he did not assist Landis or any others dope.

Categories : Cycling, News


  • Suzejmc

    Now why would Tailwind be registered at the same business address as Mellow Johnny's and CS&E – two companies owned by Armstrong – in 2002? And doesn't this new story – that Armstrong never got any stock until 2007 by which time Tailwind were inoperative – rather make Armstrong & Stapleton look ineffecient & ineffective when the myth demands that they are both the savviest businessmen on the planet. The bottom line is not WHEN Armstrong had ownership in Tailwind but that he HAD ownership in Tailwind after flatly denying it. He either lied under oath in 2005, or he lied on Wednesday which goes straight to Armstrong's credibility. This latest attempt to spin himself as just a 'little fish' – a rider just like Hamilton, Livingston et al – is at best disingenuous and at worst a proven lie.

  • MeMyself

    Yeah, sure. Deny, deny, deny. After all, you are innocent until proven guilty. Isn't that how it works?